Отходы > > >

Сведения об авторах

Utilization of Waste Tire Rubber in Manufacture of Particleboard

Nadir Ayrilmis, Umit Buyuksari, Erkan Avci, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
 Ali Nejdet Kuru, Un-Sal Danismanlik Gida Tekstil Endustriyel Urunleri San. ve Tic. Ltd Sti., Seyhan/Adana, Turkey

Introduction

In the recent years, there is a strong interest for a manufacture of products from recycled materials. The advantage of this is that recycling of materials makes a technology more economically and environmentally attractive. Waste tires are of major concern among waste materials in terms of the developing civilization. The amount of waste tires increases constantly together with the demand for tires. Their lifetime is short. Therefore, it is necessary to develop methods of waste tire recycling. Disposal of used automotive tires has caused many environmental and economic problems to the majority of countries. A policy of most countries is to encourage recycling and, in particular, the use of waste tires as construction material to prevent environmental pollution. According to European Tyre Recycling Association (ETRA) Conference 2007 in Brussels, Belgium, equivalent of 300 million or more scrap tires reach their end-of-life each year in the 27 member states of the European Union.

It is a fact that demand for wood products has been increasing with the increase of world population, which has a negative influence on sustainable utilization of forest resources. Currently, approximately 70 % of raw materials necessary for Turkish particleboard industry are supplied from Canada, Russia, and Ukraine because of decreasing availability of raw material in Turkey. Value-added wood based panels manufactured from recycled materials would be considered as an alternative solution to this problem.

The objective of this study was to investigate possibilities to produce particleboards using recycled waste tires and consequently solve serious problem of environmental pollution caused by tire industry.

Materials and Methods

Wood flakes of two types — coarse and fine flakes were used in the laboratory to produce three-layer particleboard containing tire rubber. The coarse flakes were used for the core layer of the three-layer particleboard while the fine flakes were used for the face layers of the board.

The waste tire rubber crumbs were prepared from waste tires with reinforced tendons being mechanically removed prior to grinding. The process of grinding waste tires consists of mechanical cutting and granulation. Two types of waste tire rubber crumbs, passing 80-mesh and 30-mesh screens, were received from Un-sal Waste Tire Processing Company in Adana, Turkey. The tire rubber crumbs (between 0.8 and 2.75 mm), passing 30-mesh screen, were used for core layer while the rubber crumbs (between 0.01 and 0.8 mm), passing 80-mesh screen, were used for surface layers of particleboard (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Two types of waste tire rubber crumbs:
a — the tire rubber crumbs passing 30-mesh screen for core layer; b — the rubber crumbs passing 80-mesh screen for surface layers

Prior to processing the rubber crumbs were dried up to moisture content between 3-4 %. The liquid melamine-urea formaldehyde (MUF) resin containing 75 % urea and 25 % melamine (based on liquid resin with 6 % solids) and the polyisocyanate (PI) resin were separately used for wood flakes and rubber crumbs.

Particleboard Manufacture

Particleboards were manufactured at a specific density of 0.65 g/cm3 with waste tire rubber crumbs contents of 10, 20, and 30 wt % based on the weight of the oven-dried raw material. For comparison of the physical and mechanical properties of the boards with waste tire rubber, the control boards were also manufactured.

The waste rubber crumbs, passing 80-mesh screen, and fine wood flakes were mixed up and placed into a rotary drum mixer. This composition was slowly mixed up with 10 wt % (based on the weight of the oven-dried raw material) MUF adhesive. The same procedure was applied to mix up the coarse wood flakes and waste rubber crumbs, passing 30-mesh screen, to prepare core layer of particleboard. Polyisocyanate resin was added to the mixture of wood flakes and the tire rubber crumbs similarly to the MUF resin for the first board type. The NH4Cl solution (20 %) was added in the quantity of 1 % based on solid weight of the MUF resin. The ratio of the face thickness to the total thickness of a board known as the shelling ratio was 0.30 for all specimens. The mat was pre-pressed at 0.5 N/mm2 for 30 s and then pressed in a laboratory hot press at 180 °C and 2.5 N/mm2 for 10 min to 10 mm of the target thickness.

A total of 16 particleboards (8 boards made using MUF resin and 8 boards made using polyisocyanate resin) were produced for the experiments. It were produced 8 boards — two of each of four treatment levels (control and 3 levels of tire rubber to wood flakes mixing ratios: 10/90, 20/80, 30/70).

All physical and mechanical tests on the experimental particleboards were conducted in accordance with corresponding European Norms (EN). It were performed the following tests: thickness swelling (TS) (EN 317, 1993), density (EN 323, 1993), modulus of rupture (MOR) (EN 310, 1993), modulus of elasticity (MOE) (EN 310, 1993) and internal bond (IB) (EN 319, 1993).

Results and Discussion

Table 1 summarizes the average TS, MOR, and MOE results of the control boards and particleboards with waste tire rubber.

Table 1

Some physical and mechanical properties of particleboards with waste tire rubber

Particleboard composition,
wt %

Density,
g/cm3

Thickness swelling,
 %

Internal bond,
 N/mm2

Modulus of rupture,
 N/mm2

Modulus of elasticity,
 N/mm2

Wood

Rubber

MUF

PI

MUF

PI

MUF

PI

MUF

PI

MUF

PI

0

100

0.659 (0.02)

0.656 (0.03)

28.51 Aa (1.58)b

23.49 A (2.62)

0.45 A (0.03)

0.59 A (0.02)

14.79 A (1.29)

15.40 A (1.37)

2070.49 A (274.21)

2215.08 A (182.44)

90

10

0.661 (0.03)

0.652 (0.03)

32.50 B (2.74)

25.51 B (1.39)

0.35 B (0.02)

0.42 B (0.02)

12.85 B (2.47)

13.63 B (2.61)

1821.25 B (366.66)

1922.90 B (370.52)

80

20

0.656 (0.03)

0.653 (0.03)

25.79 C (1.25)

20.90 C (1.56)

0.25 C (0.02)

0.35 C (0.03)

8.10 C (3.48)

9.15 C (3.47)

1402.17 C (420.37)

1629.59 C (420.37)

70

30

0.655 (0.04)

0.658 (0.06)

13.45 D (1.97)

12.26 D (2.24)

0.23 C (0.04)

0.32 C (0.01)

6.29 D (3.85)

7.52 D (3.82)

1162.14 D (456.17)

1286.12 D (467.73)

a Groups with same letters in each column indicate that there is no statistical difference (p < 0.01) between the samples according to the Duncan's multiply range test.
b Values in parentheses represent standard deviation.

Thickness Swelling

Except for 10 % loading level of tire rubber, TS values of the particleboards at 20 and 30 % loading levels were significantly decreased as compared to those of control values (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Effects of waste tire rubber and resin type on average values of thickness swelling of three-layer particleboard

Homogeneity groups for thickness swelling were shown individually by Duncan's multiple-comparison tests (Table 1). Except for the lowest loading level (10 % tire rubber) based on oven-dry panel weight, TS values of the particleboard containing 20 and 30 % tire rubber were found to comply with particleboard maximum property requirement for use in non load-bearing applications in humid conditions according to EN 312 Type P3 (2005).

TS values of the samples made using polyisocyanate resin at all loading levels of the tire rubber were lower than those of samples produced with MUF resin (Table 1). Polyisocyanate plays an important role and affects physical properties of wood composites. Comparing with the traditional wood binders, such as urea-formaldehyde, melamine-formaldehyde, and phenol-formaldehyde resins, polyisocyanate exhibits high bonding strength and bonding efficiency, fast curing rate, less sensitivity to the moisture content of wood and good water resistance. High chemical affinity and reactivity with hydrogen-contained groups, such as hydroxyl and sulphonic groups, result in excellent bonding wood flakes and good bonding between wood flakes and rubber crumbs. In the hot-press process of wood flakes and tire rubber mat, rubber crumbs are compressed and deformed from round particles to flatbreads. Wood flakes are compressed close to each other and densified, which decreases wood flake capillaries in the particleboard. Hydroxyl groups in the particleboard were reduced with a decrease of wood flake and tire rubber ratio, which improved the dimensional stability.

Mechanical properties

Modulus of rupture and modulus of elasticity

MOR and MOE values of the particleboards containing 10, 20, and 30 % waste tire rubber based on the oven-dry panel weight were significantly decreased when compared to control values. MOR and MOE values of the particleboards decreased with the increasing tire rubber ratio (Figs. 3, 4).

Fig. 3. Effects of waste tire rubber and resin type on average values of modulus of rupture of three-layer particleboard

Fig. 4. Effects of waste tire rubber and resin type on average values of modulus of elasticity of three-layer particleboard

The average MOR values of MUF bonded particleboards ranged from 13 to 58 % lower than the average of the control samples while those values for polyisocyanate bonded particleboards ranged from 12 to 51 % (Table 2).

Table 2

Percentage change in average values of physical and mechanical properties of particleboard groups as a function of waste tire rubber ratio

Particleboard composition, wt %

Decreases (-) and increases (+) of the thickness swelling and strength values of the treatment groups as compared to control boards, %

Thickness swelling

Internal bond

Modulus of rupture

Modulus of elasticity

Wood

Rubber

MUF

PI

MUF

PI

MUF

PI

MUF

PI

90

10

+ 14.0

+8.6

-21.5

-29.4

-13.1

-11.5

-12

-13.2

80

20

-9.5

-11.0

-41.2

-41.7

-45.2

-40.6

-32.3

-26.4

70

30

-52.8

-47.8

-49.0

-46.9

-57.5

-51.2

-43.9

-41.9

At the lowest rubber loading level (10 %) based on the oven-dry panel weight, the MOR and MOE values of particleboards made using MUF and polyisocyanate resins met the particleboard minimum requirements (MOR is 12.5 N/mm2 for Type P1 general purpose particleboards and MOE is 1800 N/mm2 for Type P2 particleboards) of EN 312 standard.

Wood particle to tire rubber ratio is a critical factor influencing mechanical properties of composites. Wood flakes and rubber crumbs have significantly different mechanical properties. Wood flakes have high strength and elastic modulus but lower impact strength and poor water resistance. Bending strength of particleboards is strongly influenced by the properties of their constituent materials, their volume ratio and interaction among them. From the morphological point of view wood flakes have long and thin forms. However, the rubber crumbs are round particles and their aspect ratios are very low as compared to wood flakes. Wood flake geometry is highly correlated with board bending and stiffness properties.

Internal bond strength

IB values of polyisocyanate bonded particleboards at all loading levels (10, 20, and 30 %) of waste tire rubber were found to comply with EN 312 Type P1 (IB strength minimum property requirement of 0.28 N/mm2). However, MUF bonded particleboards met the standard (Type P1) at only the lowest rubber loading level (10 %) (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5. Effects of waste tire rubber and resin type on average values of internal bond strength of three-layer particleboard

By increasing MUF resin content, interface bonding between wood flakes and rubber crumbs and the IB strength can be improved.

Conclusions

Mechanical properties of all particleboards made using MUF and polyisocyanate were found to comply with the general-purpose particleboard minimum property requirements of EN 312 Type P1 (2005) values used in dry conditions at the lowest tire rubber loading level (10 %) based on oven-dry panel weight. Taking into consideration the findings of the presented study, waste tire rubber crumbs can be used in manufacture of general-purpose particleboard up to 10 % ratio based on the oven dry board weight.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by Research Fund of the Istanbul University. Project number: UDP:3049. The authors wish to acknowledge Research Fund of the Istanbul University for financial support.

Сведения об авторах

Nadir Ayrilmis, Ph. D., research wood scientist, Department of Wood Mechanics and Technology, Forestry Faculty, Istanbul University, Bahcekoy, Sariyer, 34473, Istanbul, Turkey. Tel. (212) 226-11-00/2-50-83, fax (212) 226-11-13. E-mail
Umit Buyuksari, Ph. D. candidate, research assistant, Department of Wood Mechanics and Technology, Forestry Faculty, Istanbul University, Bahcekoy, Sariyer, 34473, Istanbul, Turkey. Tel. (212) 226-11-00/2-53-56, fax (212) 226-11-13. E-mail
Erkan Avci, Ph. D. candidate, research assistant, Department of Wood Mechanics and Technology, Forestry Faculty, Istanbul University, Bahcekoy, Sariyer, 34473, Istanbul, Turkey. Tel. (212) 226-11-00/2-53-62, fax (212) 226-11-13. E-mail
Ali Nejdet Kuru, plant manager, Un-Sal Danismanlik Gida Tekstil Endustriyel Urunleri San. ve Tic. Ltd Sti., Ataturk Cad Gulbahcesi Sitesi B Blok Kat 3 No. 97, Seyhan/Adana, Turkey. Tel. (322) 459-91-11, fax (322) 459-93-89. E-mail

 




© Последние изменения внесены 10.06.09



© EcoInform